Response from: chupieandjsmama    (03/18/08 9:01am)

The allergy statement popped up in early 2006 when the new labeling laws took affect. My son was eating them and not reacting so his allergist said to continue giving them to him. The problem for us came about when they switched to the "trans fat free" oil. I called McD's corporate to see if the wheat and milk concentration would be the same and they couldn't tell me. The only way we'd know is if we let him eat them and waited to see if he reacted or not. At that time we decided it wasn't worth the chance. No more McD's for us which was hard because he really loved them and it was his only "special treat".

Response from: ruth    (03/19/08 3:25am)

Isn't it sad that such a big corporation wouldn't be willing to go an extra mile to ascertain if the new oil they use contain more of the beef flavoring? I guess they earn enough revenues from non-food allergic patrons. :(

Response from: As If    (03/19/08 10:09am)

McDonald's has actually tried (a little bit) to make compromises with dieters of various kinds over the years. They're not the most conscientious mass-junk-food purveyor, but they're far from the worst.

I do sympathize for your son, mama. But I think it is silly to be worried about these things when after all you are talking about feeding yoru son a FRIED REFORMULATED POTATO. Carbohydrates and salt in boiling fat. Please get him interested in a treat like raisins or grapes or something that's actually nutritious food!

Response from: micca    (05/04/09 4:52am)

I've had it (I live in NYC). I didn't realize that it wasn't national yet. The meat tastes slightly better than their regular patties, but it's nothing special. Anyone remember the Arch Deluxe and the McLean ( http://rapid4me.com/?q=McLean
)?