Filed in archive
Allergy Blogs
, Food Allergies
, Living with Allergies
by ruth on March 26, 2007

Here's another nut allergic ranting about it. Like Legal Eagle, my son generally does not show an allergic reaction when eating products that have "may contain nuts" on the label. My theory is either the level of contamination is too low to register in my son's immune system, or as she put:
the label is just a lawyer's trick to cover companies on the 0.01% off chance that a hazelnut fragment falls into the vanilla ice cream mix.
Go ahead and jump to Legal Eagle's blog entry and get a lawyer's perspective on labeling, food allergy guidelines in schools, and crops that are genetically modified to be less allergenic.
Permalink: A Lawyer's Perspective on Food Allergies
Tags:
peanut+allergy
nut+allergy
food+allergy
food+labeling
allergies
food+allergies
perspective+food
lawy
Trackback: http://publish.creative-weblogging.com/publish/mt-tb.pl/59392
Mr Wong
Vote for A Lawyer's Perspective on Food Allergies:
|
Rating: 6.33 out of 3 vote(s) cast.
|
Response from:
Ria
(03/27/07 4:32pm)
I went to a presentation recently by a food scientist and a nutritionist who addressed food labeling and the manufacturing process. They mentioned that "May contain..." has resulted in a drop in sales for those products because people/parents (of course), will err on the side of caution and not buy it. So generally, big food manufacturers seriously weigh the risks before they include that advisory language, rather than using the "cover your a..." strategy. Our latest bulletin has more on "Making Sense of Food Labels." (www.checkmytag.com/downloads.html)
Subscribe
Use the search to look for other interesting posts
| RSS | See all blog subscribe options |
|
What is RSS? | |
| Yahoo! |
|
| Addthis |
|
| Bloglines |
|
| Newsletter | |
| Follow us on Twitter! |







